The re-contemporised ideas of the second coming, anti-Christ, second coming, mark of the beast and so on.

The re-contemporised ideas of the second coming, anti-Christ, second coming, mark of the beast and so on.
by valpetridis @ 2008-11-14 - 20:34:32
The re-contemporised ideas of the second coming, anti-Christ, second coming, mark of the beast and so on.
Someone I know has a sister who is becoming a nun. The nuns at the monetary have renewed their ideas of the coming of the antichrist and the subsequent return of Christ and the events that lead up to this second coming; Unfortunately part of their bias lies in the promotion of their monastic life as ideal for enduring the ravages of this imagined transition from freedom to the slavery of the evil ones. For instance, they claim that people will be forced to tattoo the mark 666 on their arms and will be able to only be able to engage in commerce if this insignia appears on them. I have already made a more profound interpretation of this mark of distinction that represents a passing grade for learning that human’s are not the only intelligent beings in the universe and becoming aware of what makes up the idea of living beings in general. If one does not get a passing grade one will not be believed in our time, ideas will neither be sold nor bought. Moreover, such people with out marks will be excluded from the lamb that is becoming a Sheppard and the small book of life that represents a server system that allows one to survive, be saved like a file, during the upload upgrade caused by this teacher’s lesson. The nuns believe that people will have to run to monasteries like the nuns have to save their souls from the mark and damnation. Getting a mark does not reflect on their person being good or evil, their action does. It is being good or evil that saves or damns someone respectfully, not whether one wears a mark or not. They also believe people will run for the hills, or mountains, and will be forced to eat grasses (radicchio and dandelion) to survive. When told Hitler fulfilled the idea of an anti-Christ, because he was someone who called himself a Christ but did not act like a Christ and that as they know Christ means virtuous and good one, and that Hitler who condoned and practiced evil, practiced the opposite of virtue and that anti means opposite, thus Hitler was the anti Christ, they replied then Christ was to come soon after the antichrist, where is he?Someone might reply is he not in Spain? Is Christ writing through his incarnations as we speak? Why was the year 2000 thought to be his return and why is it now extended 40 more years? I do not buy what the nuns teach, it’s a cute idea, it can inspire, but it made me laugh.Peace to them.
More on time tomorrowCiao.