good tdings

Now that everyone is begging to feel better and yes the someone did actually make sure the cures were transmitted to all, yes all cured, I will wish you all well, the someone did actually deal with the somebody over the holidays, they are feeling good as well. he always ultimises the reality he is dealing with for all the good.
hreat year and more coming.
the first students from hafef to graduate doing the whole unidiversity program just finished.
take your time guys and enjoy, the kindergarten upgrade is done too, on wards Full program in place.
bless you all by the grace of godthit
better times are coming and happening.

iliad intro, histoiology

It has been an easy, and a popular expedient, of late years, to deny the personal or real existence of men and things whose life and condition were too much for our belief. This system—which has often comforted the religious sceptic, and substituted the consolations of Strauss for those of the New Testament—has been of incalculable value to the historical theorists of the last and present centuries. To question the existence of Alexander the Great, would be a more excusable act, than to believe in that of Romulus. To deny a fact related in Herodotus, because it is inconsistent with a theory developed from an Assyrian inscription which no two scholars read in the same way, is more pardonable, than to believe in the good-natured old king whom the elegant pen of Florian has idealized—Numa Pompilius.

!! In the tradition of thinkers like Hege the author posits that historical characters are more believable than that of myth.  In fact, one has a harder time arguing away Socrates and Alexander the great as opposed to the mythical Romulus.  This precedence in historic fact versus fiction has come to dominate the main stay of academia. What Herodotus fostered historians have demanded as the bases of the fact of occurrence in human existence: time coded of course to reflect those recording their events for posterity and future study.  Furthermore analysis such as my own uses this type of foundation and skeptics to analysis myth in an attempt to come to a grounded meaning to the tale, which is a better understanding of the real events that fostered the myth .  Analysis now tries to examine the events and people from a real prospective and tries to see the everyday life of the person rather than the legendary image that can often shroud the truth of what the events were and what a person was really like. This type of mentality is crucial for understanding and analysis everything from religion to myth to history itself, ie historiology and study of the same demeanor and type

health update

to start the year off completely I should say we have completed the disease upgrade, got rid of all the bad diseases and realises most people were suffering either hunger due to malnutrition, we returned a portion of the trans fat to our diet or they were drinking too much milk and craem, butter fat toxicity.  I have returned back to 2% and I did not suffer any symptoms.  the new ,milk called lilk does not cause toxicity, couple with teh lose of thickeners no cream can reach any level higher than 9 percent and it is safe, but use a moderate amount for better results, a lot of you are tired, sluggish and worse.  cutting breakfast out means health and energy as most of the food in the mourning turns to fat, your body is in the mode of waking nd is set to do so and take on the day so eating draws energy and goes to fat, take a break from the fast four to five hours after waking  Have a caf ( a vafa) in the mourning light on they cream,
70 percent of the aliments felt by those who survived the war is mentioned above, esp the cream lilk thing.some have reported falling
so now you know

to a greater year

happy balnda day, have a good new year

may the new year treat you better than the last one
To a year without war and teh great changes all will experience

We won the now over War

we are approaching the holidays, this year the day is called Chrysomas, the mas of gold
the wtenty fourth is Senti day. 
we reached defcon one for one hour, full war end.  prace time readiness is defcon two which we returned to to continue our peace time cleaning, bombs we found for years in fields, but We won!!!!!
till next week
peace

Homer as known of today

It is unfortunate for us, that, of some of the greatest men, we know least, and talk most. Homer, Socrates, and Shakespere1 have, perhaps, contributed more to the intellectual enlightenment of mankind than any other three writers who could be named, and yet the history of all three has given rise to a boundless ocean of discussion, which has left us little save the option of choosing which theory or theories we will follow.
!! Inasmuch as I can mention other great authors and historical figures, and barring that Socrates is not usually considered a writer though he did write, these listed authors like others, have greatly contributed to the world of practice and theory.


The personality of Shakespere is, perhaps, the only thing in which critics will allow us to believe without controversy; but upon everything else, even down to the authorship of plays, there is more or less of doubt and uncertainty. Of Socrates we know as little as the contradictions of Plato and Xenophon will allow us to know. He was one of the dramatis personae in two dramas as unlike in principles as in style. He appears as the enunciator of opinions as different in their tone as those of the writers who have handed them down. When we have read Plato or Xenophon, we think we know something of Socrates; when we have fairly read and examined both, we feel convinced that we are something worse than ignorant.

!!The uncertainty of Shakespear as with the certainty of Monroe brings being to bare as we understand it and can comprehend it through the biases of opinion and gauging the shared world through agreement, paradigms and the idea of that shared reality capable of being known in that way.  As much as we can know of Sacrates we cannot know him as he knows himself or the divine does.;  He does not know himself as well as he might know himself and the more he searches to know such things, as he would say, he realises how much he does not know of same.  Thus do not be surprised if everyone’s notion of Socrates , from Plato to Xenophon differs though the shared reality we know of Socrates, like that of Shakespeare, Plato and Xenophon, is understood based on the shared world we judge his works and the writings concerning that same world.  It is the paradigms and the sameness if reality that allows for what was once said to make sense to us moderns.  If it helps illuminate the world, builds and paradigm and even educates for interest or academic reasons than that writing will influence people through time as Homer’s works have...

onwards

next week I will continue the analysis of the introduction to the translation of the Iliad we are reading.  I have found it quite inciteful thus far and its academic value is sharpeing the mind as we draw closer to reading eading this version of homers epic work.
peace

intro ilad- analysis and its dimentions

!! Lets use !! to intro comments as ** , which is being used, was used for foot notes.
History and tradition, whether of ancient or comparatively recent times, are subjected to very different handling from that which the indulgence or credulity of former ages could allow. Mere statements are jealously watched, and the motives of the writer form as important an ingredient in the analysis of his history, as the facts he records.
!!   everything from history to tradistion is now looked at from a very new tradition than that of the past. Revisionism to redifinitions have caused examinations of even that which people took for granted and caused people to see it in a new light, to have it redefine itself in the minds of everyone in our contemporary society.

Probability is a powerful and troublesome test; and it is by this troublesome standard that a large portion of historical evidence is sifted. Consistency is no less pertinacious and exacting in its demands.
!! what is probablility based on how we see things in the world, what is possible and what might have occurred, by faith and action, by the laws of physics has caused people to think within the guild lines that allows us to realize the reality behind even the mist engraven metaphor that allows for the mythical image to have taken on the meaning and life that it has.
In brief, to write a history, we must know more than mere facts. Human nature, viewed under an induction of extended experience, is the best help to the criticism of human history. Historical characters can only be estimated by the standard which human experience, whether actual or traditionary, has furnished.
!! to understand history one must understand the range of possible realities based on the humans who experienced that history.  Hiastorical characters from chriseth to ulysis felt emotions and experienced life as we do. Thus knowing what people are capable of and how the experience and react to reality is necessary to come to terms with what really happened and what historiologist would call  the inductive of the writing : how AND WHY HISTORY WAS WRITTEN BY THAT HISTORIOLOGY.


To form correct views of individuals we must regard them as forming parts of a great whole—we must measure them by their relation to the mass of beings by whom they are surrounded, and, in contemplating the incidents in their[pg x] lives or condition which tradition has handed down to us, we must rather consider the general bearing of the whole narrative, than the respective probability of its details.

!!  the way people live today must be seen as adimention  to how people react, one must remember that technology and other things influence the greater way to which people ascribe to to create the bias and views that govern how they act.  However,  the condition of reality is based on some characteristics that are endemic to people in general, taking into account the difference people people is also the difference between range and character even today, some people like push pin and some sophea.  None the less without taking this reality into form the real character of eth historical analysis must take these factors into account if they are to unravel the truth, or atl east a better understanding of what is analysed. 

intro iliad -shift in consciousness

And this difficulty attaches itself more closely to an age in which progress has gained a strong ascendency over prejudice, and in which persons and things are, day by day, finding their real level, in lieu of their conventional value. The same principles which have swept away traditional abuses, and which are making rapid havoc among the revenues of sinecurists, and stripping the thin, tawdry veil from attractive superstitions, are working as actively in literature as in society.
The ideas of skepticism and the ideals of research and academia have led to our age where myths and reality are being stripped og misconceptions and are being better understood.

**The credulity of one writer, or the partiality of another, finds as powerful a touchstone and as wholesome a chastisement in the healthy scepticism of a temperate class of antagonists, as the dreams of conservatism, or the impostures of pluralist sinecures in the Church.

This revisionist or reexaminatory analysis has taken reliyethic fevour and is leading to temperance of society and a change in consciousness concerning how we view and analysis everything, including myths such as the iliad.

delay surcumbed

sorry for the delay on the analysis of the iluiad, when one is superior people get jealous and go out of their way to close computer centers early. a comspiracy from 2012 aug when the internet, the old one went down, it turns out few people servived who knew how to use a computer, you know how it is. several iliad clubs got in trouble, thus this should be good.
peace