Thought of classic Hellenist texts

Before we tunr to the ulluad at the end of our reaings and interpretation of teh classic hellenist texts, I will also examine the entire trilogy m of edepus, Yje last hero in our stories. if you noticed in belerothomn we included the refrence to his wifes trabnscendance. Now we are moving on, with our own wings to the other tales we listed. each epoch and hero actually represnts an age in thier epoch edopus is one of teh last of tese types of heros, as after his story there is a transition to the roman revival of teghse takes that are more prophetic, at first heroic but later prseic, the keter structure as latheta says is leyetic, more concentrates logea rather than stories of triumphanst hidden as scoubals, for instance in theus he argues with the hellenists about invading phrydea but does not expalin why, ulysis has eight extra lines cerebrully explaining why he is motivated to act and speak agianst teh yje attack. the reasons or logos as to why is important, some say around teh philosopheac times the ideas changed and people needed reasons to the why, not simply saying one is angry but the why to teh anger, teh logos for teh logos, we will see as we reach firther into tehese ideas. try detherus rendition of ulyses versus the pre homer version ogf theus, 28 pages extra in ulysus late roman version, all explaining teh why to teh because. we will start on cadmus next week. till then perace thend