Now that everyone is begging to feel better and yes the someone did actually make sure the cures were transmitted to all, yes all cured, I will wish you all well, the someone did actually deal with the somebody over the holidays, they are feeling good as well. he always ultimises the reality he is dealing with for all the good.
hreat year and more coming.
the first students from hafef to graduate doing the whole unidiversity program just finished.
take your time guys and enjoy, the kindergarten upgrade is done too, on wards Full program in place.
bless you all by the grace of godthit
better times are coming and happening.
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
iliad intro, histoiology
It has been an easy, and a popular expedient, of late years, to deny the personal or real existence of men and things whose life and condition were too much for our belief. This system—which has often comforted the religious sceptic, and substituted the consolations of Strauss for those of the New Testament—has been of incalculable value to the historical theorists of the last and present centuries. To question the existence of Alexander the Great, would be a more excusable act, than to believe in that of Romulus. To deny a fact related in Herodotus, because it is inconsistent with a theory developed from an Assyrian inscription which no two scholars read in the same way, is more pardonable, than to believe in the good-natured old king whom the elegant pen of Florian has idealized—Numa Pompilius.
!! In the tradition of thinkers like Hege the author posits that historical characters are more believable than that of myth. In fact, one has a harder time arguing away Socrates and Alexander the great as opposed to the mythical Romulus. This precedence in historic fact versus fiction has come to dominate the main stay of academia. What Herodotus fostered historians have demanded as the bases of the fact of occurrence in human existence: time coded of course to reflect those recording their events for posterity and future study. Furthermore analysis such as my own uses this type of foundation and skeptics to analysis myth in an attempt to come to a grounded meaning to the tale, which is a better understanding of the real events that fostered the myth . Analysis now tries to examine the events and people from a real prospective and tries to see the everyday life of the person rather than the legendary image that can often shroud the truth of what the events were and what a person was really like. This type of mentality is crucial for understanding and analysis everything from religion to myth to history itself, ie historiology and study of the same demeanor and type
!! In the tradition of thinkers like Hege the author posits that historical characters are more believable than that of myth. In fact, one has a harder time arguing away Socrates and Alexander the great as opposed to the mythical Romulus. This precedence in historic fact versus fiction has come to dominate the main stay of academia. What Herodotus fostered historians have demanded as the bases of the fact of occurrence in human existence: time coded of course to reflect those recording their events for posterity and future study. Furthermore analysis such as my own uses this type of foundation and skeptics to analysis myth in an attempt to come to a grounded meaning to the tale, which is a better understanding of the real events that fostered the myth . Analysis now tries to examine the events and people from a real prospective and tries to see the everyday life of the person rather than the legendary image that can often shroud the truth of what the events were and what a person was really like. This type of mentality is crucial for understanding and analysis everything from religion to myth to history itself, ie historiology and study of the same demeanor and type
health update
to start the year off completely I should say we have completed the disease upgrade, got rid of all the bad diseases and realises most people were suffering either hunger due to malnutrition, we returned a portion of the trans fat to our diet or they were drinking too much milk and craem, butter fat toxicity. I have returned back to 2% and I did not suffer any symptoms. the new ,milk called lilk does not cause toxicity, couple with teh lose of thickeners no cream can reach any level higher than 9 percent and it is safe, but use a moderate amount for better results, a lot of you are tired, sluggish and worse. cutting breakfast out means health and energy as most of the food in the mourning turns to fat, your body is in the mode of waking nd is set to do so and take on the day so eating draws energy and goes to fat, take a break from the fast four to five hours after waking Have a caf ( a vafa) in the mourning light on they cream,
70 percent of the aliments felt by those who survived the war is mentioned above, esp the cream lilk thing.some have reported falling
so now you know
70 percent of the aliments felt by those who survived the war is mentioned above, esp the cream lilk thing.some have reported falling
so now you know
to a greater year
happy balnda day, have a good new year
may the new year treat you better than the last one
To a year without war and teh great changes all will experience
may the new year treat you better than the last one
To a year without war and teh great changes all will experience
Friday, December 12, 2014
We won the now over War
we are approaching the holidays, this year the day is called Chrysomas, the mas of gold
the wtenty fourth is Senti day.
we reached defcon one for one hour, full war end. prace time readiness is defcon two which we returned to to continue our peace time cleaning, bombs we found for years in fields, but We won!!!!!
till next week
peace
the wtenty fourth is Senti day.
we reached defcon one for one hour, full war end. prace time readiness is defcon two which we returned to to continue our peace time cleaning, bombs we found for years in fields, but We won!!!!!
till next week
peace
Homer as known of today
It is unfortunate for us, that, of some of the greatest men, we know least, and talk most. Homer, Socrates, and Shakespere1 have, perhaps, contributed more to the intellectual enlightenment of mankind than any other three writers who could be named, and yet the history of all three has given rise to a boundless ocean of discussion, which has left us little save the option of choosing which theory or theories we will follow.
!! Inasmuch as I can mention other great authors and historical figures, and barring that Socrates is not usually considered a writer though he did write, these listed authors like others, have greatly contributed to the world of practice and theory.
The personality of Shakespere is, perhaps, the only thing in which critics will allow us to believe without controversy; but upon everything else, even down to the authorship of plays, there is more or less of doubt and uncertainty. Of Socrates we know as little as the contradictions of Plato and Xenophon will allow us to know. He was one of the dramatis personae in two dramas as unlike in principles as in style. He appears as the enunciator of opinions as different in their tone as those of the writers who have handed them down. When we have read Plato or Xenophon, we think we know something of Socrates; when we have fairly read and examined both, we feel convinced that we are something worse than ignorant.
!!The uncertainty of Shakespear as with the certainty of Monroe brings being to bare as we understand it and can comprehend it through the biases of opinion and gauging the shared world through agreement, paradigms and the idea of that shared reality capable of being known in that way. As much as we can know of Sacrates we cannot know him as he knows himself or the divine does.; He does not know himself as well as he might know himself and the more he searches to know such things, as he would say, he realises how much he does not know of same. Thus do not be surprised if everyone’s notion of Socrates , from Plato to Xenophon differs though the shared reality we know of Socrates, like that of Shakespeare, Plato and Xenophon, is understood based on the shared world we judge his works and the writings concerning that same world. It is the paradigms and the sameness if reality that allows for what was once said to make sense to us moderns. If it helps illuminate the world, builds and paradigm and even educates for interest or academic reasons than that writing will influence people through time as Homer’s works have...
!! Inasmuch as I can mention other great authors and historical figures, and barring that Socrates is not usually considered a writer though he did write, these listed authors like others, have greatly contributed to the world of practice and theory.
The personality of Shakespere is, perhaps, the only thing in which critics will allow us to believe without controversy; but upon everything else, even down to the authorship of plays, there is more or less of doubt and uncertainty. Of Socrates we know as little as the contradictions of Plato and Xenophon will allow us to know. He was one of the dramatis personae in two dramas as unlike in principles as in style. He appears as the enunciator of opinions as different in their tone as those of the writers who have handed them down. When we have read Plato or Xenophon, we think we know something of Socrates; when we have fairly read and examined both, we feel convinced that we are something worse than ignorant.
!!The uncertainty of Shakespear as with the certainty of Monroe brings being to bare as we understand it and can comprehend it through the biases of opinion and gauging the shared world through agreement, paradigms and the idea of that shared reality capable of being known in that way. As much as we can know of Sacrates we cannot know him as he knows himself or the divine does.; He does not know himself as well as he might know himself and the more he searches to know such things, as he would say, he realises how much he does not know of same. Thus do not be surprised if everyone’s notion of Socrates , from Plato to Xenophon differs though the shared reality we know of Socrates, like that of Shakespeare, Plato and Xenophon, is understood based on the shared world we judge his works and the writings concerning that same world. It is the paradigms and the sameness if reality that allows for what was once said to make sense to us moderns. If it helps illuminate the world, builds and paradigm and even educates for interest or academic reasons than that writing will influence people through time as Homer’s works have...
Thursday, December 4, 2014
onwards
next week I will continue the analysis of the introduction to the translation of the Iliad we are reading. I have found it quite inciteful thus far and its academic value is sharpeing the mind as we draw closer to reading eading this version of homers epic work.
peace
peace
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)