Jason's shoe and rights of kinghood

so it says did not want to give the kigdom to a one shoe person, meaning although the event of teh crone cost Jason his one sliper, his stance was half in one place and another, he was only half sandled by the authority of the sandles. So Pelias did not want to give the kingdom to jason based on the authority represented by the slipper esp since part of it was locked to the event of teh crone but that was a begining to the journey he took. In fact, Pelias recommends Jason go through the rites of aquisition of the golden fleece and thus gain a high authority and grant for the kingdom, though ancients would have made this sound more atogonistic to add pathos, but the aurguement of authentication led to the king recommending jason go for it as it was jasons turn. Was palias on his side? pn;y in the sense of the agreement to fulfil the aunoguration of jason through the fleece which he had fai;led tio gather 12 years prior. See why Jason telling him to go through the rite was saying authenticate yourself or forfiet the throne to me, his recommendation was authenticate yourself jason or forget the throne, bit trthic rights necessitate authentication by rite so the uncle was as much on his side as he wished he might fail, in fact he was promoting the authentication that would unify the helenists and end all aurguements cocnerning who was authentically ruler by rites of teh throne.