Divine anarchy and the black shirts (G20 inspired)

Anarchy is defined by many to mean “without rule” In fact the phrase was coined by the ancient Greeks to refer to “no need of rule’ or without rule. A good definition of anarchy is: A social state in which there is no governing person or group of people, but each individual has absolute liberty (without the implication of disorder.) But is bound by a social code” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy). This social code maintains itself whether there is a governing body or not. To explain it more succinctly using a newer term to clarify the idea: divine anarchy refers to the ability to achieve a divine will and act in accordance to social propriety and lawfulness without need of governance and the enforcement of laws. It is the molding of one’s will to into a divine will and thus acting lawfully without the motive to avoid the trouble of breaking laws. When people do not steal whether laws exist for stealing does not change their behaviour. This is similar to Socrates’ city of philosopher kings in Plato’s Republic who do not need laws and governance cause each is equally capable of acting and governing in accordance to the same ideas of justice, the good and said social code. Thus Burning cars, causing social unrest and unlawful behaviour proves that one is not beyond the need of rule and law and thus incapable to be a real anarchist. A real anarchist is peaceful and lawful. A real anarchist is a divine anarchist with a divine will and is like a philosopher King. Real anarchy does not reject government but proves itself capable of the lawfulness of said governance without an enforcement of said behaviours of propriety. The laws are necessary to protect the very people incapable of being lawful from them selves and others. Thus the Black shirt anarchist that caused all the cause in Toronto and other places ruing meetings and conferences such ads the G-20 proved by their action that we need rule and law due to people like them. I am glad they reinforced the need for such laws and government and their inability to live as a divine anarchist. Many of use are enlightened and truly divine anarchists. No one needs tell us not to murder as we do not murder. Furthermore, we like having laws even if we obey the spirit of that law without fear of prosecution if we do not. It is not that I will get a ticket for driving through a red light, I know not to do so because its safer not to. See I went back to the spirit of the law that created the need for the law, went to the before the law, the without the law, the anarchy of the law that makes it exist by necessity and act lawfully not because of the law but the spirit or reason for it. This is real apathy and the anarchical reason for its inception. The black shirt anarchists that caused the civil unrest and situations last weekend we calling for help to the governments in question, they were saying “ see how much I am incapable of living without your governance, please arrest me and protect me and others from my ignorance and lack of intelligence, I need your help because I am incapable of moral, lawful behavior and thus incapable of being an anarchist, I just misuse the name I am incapable of understanding cause someone in authority misquoted the concept to me, I know just like me they need policing too for the sake of all people’. Yes their leaders broke even their simplest rules, they held authority, no rules is the rule they think/ that not a rule?
So for us capable if being divinely anarchistic and understand the reasons for laws and act accordingly without need of enforcing the law to make sure we act in such manners, the laws are the necessary to maintain such behaviours for those incapable of being so lawful based on the anarchic reasons for said laws.

So sorry black shirts some of you proved that you are incapable of such behaviour and truly calling yourselves true (divine) anarchists. You give a divine concept a bad name and actually prove that enforcement of laws to protect you and us from you are not just necessary but dire and mandatory.
Maybe the peaceful ones amongst you can teach the rest how to truly be peaceful, divine and anarchical.

As the first premise of the criminal code in Canada is to reform, correct and educate, continued unlawful anti anarchical behaviour will be policed and laws enforced to make sure that the reasons for said laws protect everyone including those incapable of understanding the truly and divine anarchical reasons for said laws. The laws are there to make sure you are treated fairly as you a educated to be good citizens with divine wills and in cases like last weekend the reasons for said laws are the improper, immoral actions perpetrated that proved these people were not true divine anarchists or lawful to allow anyone to trust them to behave properly without need of governance and enforcement of the laws they are incapable of understanding based on anarchical reasoning. When you can be lawful without need of such measures then you might be; lawfully called anarchists without tainting a divine and intelligently wise idea such as true (divine anarchy)


Peace.